One question, two to five options, decision owner, deadline, criteria, exclusions, and an explicit `do nothing` option when relevant.
Stop collecting links.
Make the decision.
This page shows how one question becomes a dated evidence map, simple comparison, written decision, next actions, and honest unknowns. Start with the free example before choosing a paid template kit.
A research pack that ends in an action, not a reading list.
Up to ten dated direct public sources. Observed facts, inference, conflicting evidence, and unknowns remain visibly separate.
Criteria-based comparison, recommendation or `insufficient evidence`, prioritized next actions, owners, stop conditions, and limitations.
Use this for one consequential choice.
| Good fit | Not included |
|---|---|
| Market entry options, competitor positioning, offer structure, build-versus-buy, channel prioritization, product scope, vendor shortlists using public facts. | Legal, medical, financial, investment, or regulatory advice; private databases; interviews; surveys; paid data; personal-data collection; ongoing monitoring; guaranteed outcomes. |
You can inspect whether the delivery is complete.
Every material factual claim maps to a dated direct source or is labeled inference or unknown.
Every option is compared against the criteria agreed before production, including operational risk and reversibility where relevant.
The receipt lists artifacts, source dates, checks, limitations, prioritized actions, buyer-owned next steps, and unresolved questions.
The $19 starter system fits one-person work. The $69 small-team kit adds shared review, client separation, change control, and delivery templates. No custom research service is included.